"Made In China" Needs More Respect.

"Made in China" products are uniquely competitive in the global market, but have not been adequately respected by consumers and the public in the world. Many people are also reflecting on the deficiency of "made in China" and demanding " Chinese creation Instead of " Made in China " The author believes that we should treat "made in China" fairly and give more respect to "made in China".

In the introspection of "made in China", labor-intensive manufacturing industries are often accused of being lacking in technology. In fact, there are also many high-tech sectors in labor-intensive industries, just as labor intensive links exist in high-tech industries. Industrial upgrading and structural adjustment are not to eliminate labor-intensive industries, but to increase technological content in the process of developing labor-intensive industries and increase the core components and raw materials provided by China. Therefore, there is a biased understanding of the contradiction between "creation in China" and "made in China".

In my submission, enterprise What we need to do is to increase the elements of "Chinese creation" in the process of "made in China", that is, increase our intellectual property rights and create our own brand. In recent years, many "made in China" products have already had a large number of "made in China" elements. Otherwise, "made in China" in the world can not have today's competitiveness. "The skin is not left behind, and the wool will be attached". Whether it is independent intellectual property or brand, it must be attached to the development and success of "made in China" and belongs to the organic part of "made in China". It is difficult to raise the image of "made in China" by opposing the two, and it is difficult to give the necessary respect to "made in China". At the same time, "creating China" has become an impossible castles in the air.

At the moment, China is in the middle of industrialization, and "made in China" is still of great significance to China, and it is responsible for solving employment opportunities and maintaining social stability for a large number of labor-intensive industries. Singapore is a highly developed country with a highly developed service sector, but it maintains a labor-intensive industry with a population of about 2.3 million. This is because no matter how advanced the economy and education are, there are always some people who can not engage in the so-called "high-end industry" for various reasons. Their way out of employment lies in the post of labor-intensive industries. In order to solve the employment problem, we must ensure that quite a number of labor-intensive jobs are preserved for a long time. From this point of view, entrepreneurs should actively undertake this social responsibility.

At present, the development of low carbon economy and social philanthropy has become an important part of many entrepreneurs' talk about social responsibility. But I think the most important problem should be to maintain and create jobs, absorb as many jobs as possible, and improve the working and living environment of employees, so as to avoid the appearance of sweatshops, make every enterprise a family, realize the harmony within the enterprise, and win the respect of the whole society.

Another important factor affecting the image of "made in China" is the long-standing "inner struggle" between enterprises. I often tell you that in recent years, "made in China" has encountered a lot of anti-dumping suits because of "fighting fiercely inside the tiger". Enterprises compete with each other, compete for price, and the price is lower and lower. "Made in China" products not only get no legal profits, but also do not get the respect they deserve, and pursue international trade sanctions. It can be said that over the past few years, we have lost the right to speak in the import and export prices of some important products, and also because the internal friction is too severe, making foreign enterprises vulnerable to loopholes. On the whole, China's manufacturing enterprises have gone beyond the original accumulation stage, and the cruel competition means that the "primitive accumulation" stage of cheating and cheating on each other and digging each other's walls should end. For the entrepreneurs in the manufacturing industry, to win respect, we must strive to achieve mutual benefit and win-win with the surrounding enterprises and upstream and downstream enterprises, and change the competitive ecology of the whole industry. This is not to change the rules of market competition, but to avoid the vicious circle of competition between enterprises.

Of course, the end of "internal struggle" by Chinese enterprises does not mean unfair "external" competition in international competition, resulting in damage to foreign enterprises, which, after all, is not in line with the market principles of the economy. However, within the scope of the rules, in accordance with the principle of mutual benefit and win-win, it is feasible for enterprises to co-operate with each other, coordinate prices, participate in anti-dumping duties, and protect the interests of the industry. It should also be seen that solving the "internal struggle" of Chinese enterprises is also a good thing for foreign enterprises. Those foreign enterprises that insist on fair competition principle are uncomfortable to see the internal strife of Chinese enterprises. They will think that there is an abnormal competition environment in this industry, and it is not suitable for long-term trade and investment cooperation. After all, an industry is too fierce in its development, and its development is bound to be distorted. This is to improve the quality of Chinese entrepreneurs, not only for their own enterprises to make money, but also to consider the healthy development of an industry in China and the world.

An enterprise group growing up in an environment of internal disorder, mutual bargaining and disorderly competition will often be regarded as a low quality and untrustworthy group by the international community and will not be respected abroad. Even if foreign enterprises or consumers benefit from it for a while, they will not speak good words. Only by closing the Chinese enterprises' internal struggle as soon as possible, can we establish a Chinese enterprise group respected by the international community as soon as possible, and "made in China" can truly get the respect it deserves.